Wenzel Spine home

Patients and Caregivers

VariLift is a Proven Option for a Less Invasive Procedure with Long-term Currative Results

A Range of Imperfect Options

Traditional Fusion

Traditional fusion usually involves interbody spacers, pedicle screws, and rods which immobilize the spine providing stability [1-6].

Non-Fusion Treatments

Non-fusion treatments usually involve partial disc removal, with no spinal stabilization.

Disadvantages of Pedicle Screw / Rod Fusion:

  • Complicated, invasive surgical procedure
  • Increased OR and anesthesia time
  • Rigid fixation limiting mobility
  • High complication rates
  • High incidence of Adjacent Level Disease

Disadvantages of Non-Fusion Treatment:

  • Increased risk of recurrent disc herniations
  • Increased risk of disc space instability
  • Increased risk of disc degeneration
See more information on Traditional Fusion See More information on Non-Fusion Surgery

 

VariLift - The Best of Both Worlds

The VariLift Interbody Fusion System combines the benefits of the procedures mentioned above, while addressing the known problems with these options. This allows the VariLift System to offer a minimally invasive, long-term curative solution to lower back pain. Learn more about the benefits of the VariLift System.

  • Minimally invasive midline incision, potentially less post-operative discomfort
  • Immediate rigid intervertebral fixation / stability
  • Shorter OR time, potentially less blood loss
  • Early ambulation, shorter hospital stay
  • Easy post-operative recovery, no rehab, short term pain meds
  • Early return to work, full physical activities
  • No recurrent disc herniations
Only your physician can diagnose and recommend the best treatment option for your particular situation. The information provided on this website is not meant to replace consultations with a physician. Inset: Herniated disc causing chronic lower back pain. Main image: After VariLift procedure, the spine is stabilized, pressure is removed from the nerves, and the pain is relieved.

 
  1. Aebi M, Etter C, Kehl T, Thalgott J: The internal skeletal fixation system, a new treatment of thoracolumbar fractures and other spinal disorders. Clin Orthop 227:30-43, 1988.
  2. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J, Guillaumat M: New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery. Clin Orthop 227:10-23, 1988
  3. Guyer DW, Wiltse LL, Peek RD: The Wiltse pedicular screw fixation system. Orthopedics 11:1455-1460,1988
  4. Krag MH, Beynnon BD, Pope MH, et al: An internal fixator for posterior application to short segments of the thoracic, lumbar, or lumbosacral spinc, design and testing. Clin Orthop 203:75-98,1986
  5. Luque ER: Interpeduncular segmental fixation. Clin Orthop 203:54-57,1986
  6. Zindrick MR: The Role of Transpedicular Fixation Systems for Stabilization of the Lumbar Spine. Orthopedic Clinics of North America 22(2), 333-344 April 1991